Was insulin shock therapy a viable clinical treatment?
As proven by the case of John Nash, the insulin shock therapy was clearly not a viable clinical treatment that was capable of curing one's psychological illness without harming the individual to a severe level. When Nash was forced to become subjected to the therapy, which was described to be aggressive and life-threatening, his friends and numerous other mathematicians and coworkers claimed that they had never seen him in a more devastating and disastrous condition (both physical and mental) before. The therapy deteriorated not only his health, appearance, and mindset, but also his ingenious mathematical skills that contributed to making the society classify him as a genius. Nonetheless, apart from the case of John Nash, the fact that it was done without anesthesia, that it was notorious for its constantly varying mortality rate, and the various negative effects it had on the physical body made the treatment itself highly dangerous for any patient suffering from schizophrenia.
2. Was John Nash an unusual case, or do you think that many schizophrenic patients can be taught to function in society without medication?
It is highly likely that John Nash was an unusual case, considering the rate of schizophrenic patients being cured without any medication has always been significantly low throughout the past years of numerous psychologists' research on schizophrenia and its treatments.
3. What are the dangers and/or advantages of this type of treatment (re: insulin shock therapy)?
4. What is the difference between the treatment of schizophrenia in 1960-1970 and today?
5. What are the various types of schizophrenia? Which would you consider the worst case to have? The least worst? Explain why for each
6. What treatments are being pioneered today for schizophrenia?
- Was insulin shock therapy a viable clinical treatment?
As proven by the case of John Nash, the insulin shock therapy was clearly not a viable clinical treatment that was capable of curing one's psychological illness without harming the individual to a severe level. When Nash was forced to become subjected to the therapy, which was described to be aggressive and life-threatening, his friends and numerous other mathematicians and coworkers claimed that they had never seen him in a more devastating and disastrous condition (both physical and mental) before. The therapy deteriorated not only his health, appearance, and mindset, but also his ingenious mathematical skills that contributed to making the society classify him as a genius. Nonetheless, apart from the case of John Nash, the fact that it was done without anesthesia, that it was notorious for its constantly varying mortality rate, and the various negative effects it had on the physical body made the treatment itself highly dangerous for any patient suffering from schizophrenia.2. Was John Nash an unusual case, or do you think that many schizophrenic patients can be taught to function in society without medication?
It is highly likely that John Nash was an unusual case, considering the rate of schizophrenic patients being cured without any medication has always been significantly low throughout the past years of numerous psychologists' research on schizophrenia and its treatments.
3. What are the dangers and/or advantages of this type of treatment (re: insulin shock therapy)?
4. What is the difference between the treatment of schizophrenia in 1960-1970 and today?
5. What are the various types of schizophrenia? Which would you consider the worst case to have? The least worst? Explain why for each
6. What treatments are being pioneered today for schizophrenia?